Will
Hypnosis Tempt Water and Oil to Mix with PACFA?
HypnosisAustralia,
October 2004
By
Dr Tracie O'Keefe DCH, Clinical Hypnotherapist, Psychotherapist &
Counsellor
Editorial Director of HypnosisAustralia Online.
One of the
major problems for the integrity and reputation of hypnosis in Australia
is its diverse use. At the moment anyone and their dog can hang a sign
outside their door and call themselves a hypnotherapist and the unsuspecting
public are sadly unable to tell well-qualified professions form charlatans.
You could be a medical doctor, psychologist, dentist, psychotherapist
or counsellor who is well qualified and trained in hypnosis associating
with like-minded professionals or a quack. The telephone book, alongside
well qualified professionals, also contains people who have done a few
weeks correspondence course and are then let loose on an suspecting public,
even without insurance or supervision. Such ill-trained individuals can
create psychological carnage with desperate people who find them through
everyday advertising.
By far the
most prolific professionals practicing hypnosis and putting themselves
out to the public as hypnotherapists are what used to be called lay hypnotherapists
in that they did not have a medical training. Nowadays, howeve,r hypnotherapists
often have first degrees in psychology, counselling, nursing or related
undergraduate studies. They also train at postgraduate levels which generally
include psychotherapeutic methodology, understanding psychopathology and
psychopharmacology, and working with professionals from other healthcare
professions. Again the problem is that the public cannot tell them apart
and it seems neither can the government which does not want to get into
the expense or politics of regulating therapists of any kind.
In the winter
of 2004, PACFA (Psychotherapists And Counselling Federation of Australia)
sanctioned the division of its professional member organisations into
sections, so there is now a hypnotherapy section. There are only two hypnotherapy
member organisations that make up that section at the moment and a need
for more to join. This would help focus that reconviction of well-qualified
hypnotherapists that the public and other professionals could easily identify.
It would further give health funds less of a headache in paying out claims
from their subscribers for hypnotherapy services.
The drawback
that is in the way of this happening is that different schools of hypnotherapy
have traditionally been like oil and water and never mixed well. Furthermore,
many professional associations are alumni organisations that are attached
to schools who may see their joining with larger organisations as a threat
to their income. The standards between many of the schools and organisations
are also very different.
The journal
did some investigation over the past year about what it took to become
a member of various Australian professional hypnotherapy organisations.
We found several things of note.
Some
organisations only allowed members that had trained with the attached
school.
Some organisations
would let virtually anyone join who could produce a certificate of any
kind.
Some organisations
were unsure what their official policy guidelines for joining were but
nevertheless advertise their members s as being well qualified.
With some
organisations it was rather like trying to join a secret society where
decisions were made behind closed door. These organisations stated that
they were not obliged to explain their decisions to potential members
and there was no transparency of processes.
Some organisations
had no credibility and were simply a cover for those doing courses from
aboard.
Some organisations
seem unable to understand the relevance and mechanism of getting their
members onto the PACFA register.
Some organisations
had no requirements for their members to have professional insurance.
The majority
of organisations had differing requirements for supervision and some had
no requirements for supervision.
All organisations
had wildly differing codes of ethics.
The conclusion
of our findings was that hypnotherapy regulation in Australia is currently
a mess. This was not because hypnosis was unproven, because there is sufficient
academic evidence for its efficacy, but because many of its practitioners
are overwhelmingly preoccupied with protection of market share above professional
associations and standards.
At this moment
in time arises an opportunity through PACFA for professional hypnotherapy
associations to apply for membership and join. For some, this will mean
changing their standards and codes of ethics and separating their organisations
from any profit-making schools. They will also need to be transparent
in the way they run those organisations and open themselves up to public
scrutiny, as does the Australian Medical Association.
On speaking
to leaders from some hypnotherapy organisations it became clear however
that there were afraid that PACFA would not be transparent in its processes,
referring to situations in similar organisations abroad, where other,
sometimes smaller organisations were refused entry into the main body.
So the question
remains how will hypnosis get oil and water to mix? The only way can be
if both PACFA and hypnotherapy organisations meet in the middle. Certainly
PACFA needs to solicit those organisations to join its greater umbrella
of therapeutic organisations as part of the greater federal therapeutic
organisation of professional therapists in Australia.
The organisations
themselves also have to change and understand that long-term profit is
through accreditation on a national scale and not just present-day niche
markets. It will mean great change in some of those organisations and
the stepping aside of some of their current officers. It will mean the
loss of profits from some of the schools and a gain of profits for some
of the members of those organisations as they become more widely recognised
nationally.
While hypnotherapy
is far older than psychology, the public has left it behind in its recognition
and that is for one reason only. Psychologists associate centrally and
that works. If hypnotherapists could only learn the lessons they teach
to their clients, the future for the profession in Australia could be
much brighter.
©HypnosisAustralia,
October 2004
|